Evidence

The Independent Reviewer gives evidence, almost invariably in public, to a variety of UK parliamentary committees. I consider this a very important way of informing the policy and political debate on counter-terrorism and civil liberties, second only to the preparation of my reports.

Written evidence and transcripts of oral evidence are available below: they are normally posted on the site of the relevant committee. Oral evidence is also streamed live and can be viewed later through the parliamentlive.tv website.

I have also given evidence (in London) to Canada’s Security and Intelligence Review Committee, to Norway’s 22 July Commission, to Germany’s G10 Committee and to Australia’s Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security. Transcripts or minutes of such evidence (to the extent they may exist) are not available here.

“Select Bibliography of Terrorism Resources”, House of Commons Library Standard Note SN05866 of 29 April 2013, has links to a wealth of Select Committee and Government material on counter-terrorism law.

Submission in relation to Clause 3 of the Counter Terrorism & Border Security Bill 2018

COUNTER TERRORISM AND BORDER SECURITY BILL:  SUBMISSION IN RELATION TO CLAUSE 3

BY MAX HILL QC AND PROFESSOR CLIVE WALKER

This paper follows evidence given to the Bill Scrutiny Committee on 26th June 2018 by Max Hill QC, Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation. Together with Professor Clive Walker QC (Hon), Senior Special Adviser to the Independent Reviewer,  the premise of this paper is to ask the question, if a new variant of section 58 is needed at all, what might that look like ?[1]

[1] This paper should be read in conjunction with the analysis already given in Professor Walker’s written submission to the Joint Committee on Human Rights.